Trade War Cited as TI Reports Sales Decline-Ameya360电子元器件采购网

Trade War Cited as TI Reports Sales Decline

发布时间：2019-01-25 00:00

作者：Ameya360

来源：EE Times

阅读量：4156

　　Chipmaker Texas Instruments posted its first year-over-year decline in quarterly sales in more than two years amid what company executives characterized as semiconductor cyclicality and weaker demand in China.

　　“We believe that after 10 quarters of year-on-year growth, the weakness we are seeing is primarily due to the semiconductor cycle,” said Rafael Lizardi, TI’s chief financial officer, in a post-earnings conference call with analysts. “In addition, the macroenvironment — including uncertainty caused by trade tensions — could impact the depth and duration of this cycle.”

　　Dave Pahl, vice president and head of investor relations, said that demand in China was weaker than in other regions of the world. “We are seeing signs from our customers and the channel that this weakness is primarily from increased caution due to trade tensions,” Pahl said. “We assume that this weakness is a combination of lower local end demand, as well as reduced exports, but we do not have visibility to distinguish between the two.”

　　Trade tensions between the U.S. and China have been escalating for over a year, with each country imposing tariffs on products exported by the other beginning last March. However, prior to TI’s quarterly report Wednesday, chip companies have generally not reported any major effects of the trade war.

　　TI (Dallas) reported sales of $3.72 billion for the fourth quarter of 2018, down 1% compared to the fourth quarter of 2017. The company reported a net income for the quarter of $1.24 billion, up 260% from the fourth quarter of 2017, when non-cash charges related to tax law changes adversely affected TI’s profit.

　　Fourth-quarter sales came in slightly below consensus analysts’ expectations of $3.75 billion. Earnings per share of $1.27 exceeded consensus analysts’ expectations of $1.24 per share.

　　For the full-year 2018, TI reported sales of $15.8 billion, up 5% compared to 2017. The company reported a net income for the year of $5.6 billion, up 51% compared to 2017.

　　TI said that it expects sales for the first quarter of this year to be between $3.34 billion and $3.62 billion, in line with analysts’ expectations.

（备注：文章来源于网络，信息仅供参考，不代表本网站观点，如有侵权请联系删除！）

Trade news

TI Claims to Obsolete FPGAs for Embedded Apps

　　Texas Instruments claims to have made the field-programmable gate array obsolete for embedded industrial applications such as servo-motor control. As the world’s largest industrial-semiconductor manufacturer, TI may be uniquely positioned to make that judgment, but that doesn’t necessarily mean FPGAs are going away.　　The short of it is that using TI’s C2000 industrial microcontroller with its DesignDRIVE fast-current-loop software provides a 460-nanosecond current loop that can eliminate the need for FPGAs in many embedded industrial control applications. The long of it is that FPGAs still have life in other applications, and TI’s approach is not the only one that offers efficiencies over the combined use of a microcontroller and FPGA, according to Tom Hackenberg, principal analyst of embedded processors at IHS Markit.　　“Energy efficiency in motors is a driver of innovation, and current-loop performance—torque response—is the fundamental [determinant] of motor drive performance,” Hackenberg said in an exclusive interview. (TI makes the case in the paper “At the heart of the matter of improving servo drive performance is the system’s current-loop or torque response performance.”) “The need to enhance this responsiveness with an FPGA would likely complicate the architecture, as the pin count will increase along with the cost and space requirements,” Hackenberg added. “The C2000 microcontroller, which is highly integrated with several on-chip features, would be a favorable solution for motor drive manufacturers.”　　Hackenberg noted that servo drives are key to a multitude of industrial applications. “In robotics and machine tools, for instance, IHS Markit predicts substantial shipment growth of GMC [generic motion control] servo drives into these applications, with average year-to-year growth of 17.1 percent and 7.1 percent, respectively, throughout 2021,” he said. “Given all considerations, I would estimate that the C2000 is a very competitive solution that is likely to eliminate the need for additional logic in some servo applications, saving designers significant cost and effort. But it is not likely to eliminate the market for FPGAs or other configurable-logic solutions, due to the wide variety of engineering skill sets, supplier relationships, valuable existing IP, and overall device design considerations that enable a continued market for alternative competitive solutions.”　　TI notes that the C2000 with DesignDRIVE delivers system-on-chip functionality, thus greatly simplifying and lowering the cost of drive-control system development. Using the C2000 with the submicrosecond-current-loop software enables higher control performance and board space savings while simplifying thermal budget design, according to TI. The approach offers subcycle pulse-width modulation (PWM) and improved control-loop bandwidths–potentially tripling a given motor’s torque response, according to TI–plus it needs just 460 ns for field-oriented control processing, replacing traditional proportional integration control for greater stability at higher speeds. The free fast-current-loop software will persuade most motor control designers to nix costly FPGAs, the company argues.　　“The use of the C2000 with DesignDRIVE software does seem to me to be an elegant solution for servo-motor control, and I have no reason to dispute any of its performance advantages,” Hackenberg said, adding that “a hands-on demonstration” of DesignDRIVE’s use for optimizing control of a servo motor had revealed it to be “an extremely quick and painless process.” Nonetheless, there are other considerations that might lead designers to use FPGAs, he said.　　“First, many servo control applications can be handled by just a microcontroller or, for significant performance demands, an embedded microprocessor. The use of an FPGA is often only a solution to enable a single processor to control multiple servos, such as [for] multiple axes of control. There may still be designs where a single microcontroller, even one as efficient as the C2000, is insufficient for a number of servos and/or additional motor controls or additional applications. An ASIC-, ASSP-, or FGPA-based solution may be required for this level of complexity,” Hackenberg said.　　“Second, many suppliers of configurable ICs such as FPGAs now offer their own configurable SoCs, which include the controller on the configurable chip, thus eliminating many of the design disadvantages highlighted by TI,” he said. “These solutions can even include multiple asymmetric processor cores to enable a real-time processor for the servo control and an applications processor for the application software, and possibly even an additional microcontroller core for sensor fusion or other application demands.　　“These are often costlier solutions, so the C2000 may or may not be competitive with these solutions, depending on the advantages of the additional integration” in a given application, Hackenberg said. “While the C2000 may still win in overall efficiency, even compared to servo-application-optimized solutions, there may be cases where it is not the most optimized solution.” For instance, “there are a number of semiconductor suppliers making ASICs and ASSPs, specifically targeting servo controls, that also offer efficiencies over the combined use of a microcontroller and an FPGA.”　　Existing intellectual-property investments are another consideration. “If a designer has significant investment in optimized logic IP—often based in an FPGA or ASIC—the cost efficiencies [of TI’s C2000-based solution] may be offset by the loss of existing IP based on hardware,” Hackenberg said. Further, “the application may cost-effectively utilize the [existing] servo controller solution for other device application features, for instance an array of non-servo-related sensors such as pressure or proximity sensors for safety, that can have direct feedback to the servo controller.”　　So while TI’s C2000 industrial MCU with DesignDRIVE software and fast current loop can potentially obsolete FPGAs in many or even most motor control applications, it likely cannot optimally serve all.

2017-07-07 00:00 阅读量：1289

型号	品牌	询价
CDZVT2R20B	ROHM Semiconductor
RB751G-40T2R	ROHM Semiconductor
MC33074DR2G	onsemi
BD71847AMWV-E2	ROHM Semiconductor
TL431ACLPR	Texas Instruments

型号

品牌

询价

ROHM Semiconductor

ROHM Semiconductor

onsemi

ROHM Semiconductor

Texas Instruments

型号	品牌	抢购
BP3621	ROHM Semiconductor
IPZ40N04S5L4R8ATMA1	Infineon Technologies
BU33JA2MNVX-CTL	ROHM Semiconductor
STM32F429IGT6	STMicroelectronics
ESR03EZPJ151	ROHM Semiconductor
TPS63050YFFR	Texas Instruments

型号

品牌

抢购

BP3621

ROHM Semiconductor

IPZ40N04S5L4R8ATMA1

Infineon Technologies

BU33JA2MNVX-CTL

ROHM Semiconductor

STM32F429IGT6

STMicroelectronics

ESR03EZPJ151