MRAM Hopeful Tweaks Game Plan Under New CEO

发布时间:2017-09-08 00:00
作者:Ameya360
来源:Dylan McGrath
阅读量:1115

  Spin Transfer Technologies (STT), one of a handful of startups developing MRAM technology, has tweaked its strategy under the leadership of former Maxim and Spansion executive Tom Sparkman, who took the helm of the company in July.

  STT (Fremont, Calif.) is still developing what it calls orthogonal spin transfer MRAM featuring perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions (pMTJs) and continues to sample MRAM devices to potential customers in North America and Asia. But in addition to working to offer functional MRAM memories, STT is now planning to productize what it calls an MRAM engine to be embedded in a spin torque transfer MRAM array to correct for inherent flaws in the MTJ technology and boost the performance of MRAM.

  In his first interview with EE Times since taking over as CEO of STT, Sparkman did not provide many details on the MRAM engine, saying the company is working to patent  the technology before going public with it. But he said he believes the MRAM engine can do for MRAM what SanDisk's invention of All Bit Line (ABL) technology did for NAND flash memory in the early 2000s, providing a mechanism to enhance the performance and reliability of what was an inherently flawed technology.

  "NAND was a terrible technology," Sparkman said. "But Eli Harari at SanDisk said, 'I know how to take this technology and put some electronics around it to make it work.' "

  The rest, as Sparkman noted, is history. NAND today is considered a key technology in mobile phones and beyond, with a market that is set to be worth more than $50 billion in 2017.

  The idea for the MRAM engine grew from technology that STT has been playing with for years as a way to correct for the inherent flaws in MRAM technology — the most widely known being that MRAM is a probabilistic technology as opposed to deterministic, meaning that writing to an MRAM cell will work nearly all the time, but occasionally fail. A big part of the challenge of MRAM development has been trying to make the write error rate as low as possible while compensating for the errors that do occur.

  STT's engineers "have become experts of correcting for all the flaws in the MTJ," Sparkman said. He added that the engine must be embedded directly into the MRAM array because it's not "a fix after the fact," an approach that STT does not believe will result in MRAM achieving its potential.

  In addition to pushing what is essentially a new strategy for the company arrived at within the past few months, Sparkman is also far more bullish on the prospects for MRAM to replace DRAM and NAND — both of which are bumping up against fundamental scaling limits — sooner than his predecessor, Barry Hoberman. Many industry insiders, including Hoberman, believe that MRAM will have more luck as an embedded memory technology and replacement for SRAM long before it will make a dent in the massive markets for stand alone DRAM and NAND.

  "That's not to say that there won't be early adopters," Sparkamn said. "People with the biggest pain points are going to be the first to adopt," he added, citing as an example the military/aerospace market.

  But Sparkman believes that adoption for MRAM will be far faster than widely believed. "I actually personally believe that this adoption is going to be very fast," he said.

  With some companies, including Samsung, saying they expect to have MRAM in production next year, "we need to be strapping on our boots and saying 'Where do we play? Where's our piece?' " Sparkman said.

  MRAM has long been seen as a potential replacement for SRAM, DRAM and flash, but development, which began in earnest in the 1990s, has been slow. To date, only one company, Everspin Technologies, has shipped working MRAM products. Everspin has been shipping MRAM since back in 2006 when it was still part of Freescale Semiconductor. Last August, Everspin became the first vendor to announce it was sampling MRAM with pMTJs,  considered by all vendors developing MRAM to offer the best scalability, shape dependence and magnetic scalability.

  Today, a host of companies — old and new alike — are scrambling to bring products to market, including the likes of IBM, Intel, Samsung, Fujitsu, Hynix, Qualcomm, Renesas and Toshiba, as well as Avalanche Technology, a startup that like STT is also headquartered in Fremont. Major foundries including TSMC, Globalfoundries and Samsung have all announced plans to offer embedded MRAM technology in the next year or two.

  The potential size and growth rate of the MRAM market is still largely a matter of debate. Everspin, in documents filed for its IPO last year, estimated that the MRAM market would be worth $1.8 billion this year. An April report by Grand View Research, a San Francisco-based market research and consulting company, estimated that the MRAM market would be worth $4.8 billion by 2025.

  Sparkman was appointed STT CEO on July 11 by Allied Minds, an IP commercialization firm which has incubated STT since prior to its founding in 2007. Sparkman brings to the job more than 35 years of experience in the semiconductor and wireless industries, including stints at Motorola, Maxim, Samplify Systems, IDT and Spansion.

(备注:文章来源于网络,信息仅供参考,不代表本网站观点,如有侵权请联系删除!)

在线留言询价

相关阅读
Embedded MRAM Can Take the Heat
  On the heels of several foundries publicly announcing plans to put MRAM into production by the end of this year and into 2018, one of them has outlined how it can significantly improve data retention for embedded applications.  At the recent 2017 International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Applications in Japan, Globalfoundries outlined in a technical paper Everspin Technologies' progress with moving embedded MRAM (eMRAM) forward into the 22nm process node.  In a telephone interview with EE Times, Dave Eggleston Globalfoundries' vice president of embedded memory, said the key breakthrough highlighted in the paper is the ability for eMRAM to retain data through solder reflow at 260 degrees Celsius, and for more than 10 years at 125 degrees Celsius, plus read/write with outstanding endurance at 125 degrees Celsius. This will enable eMRAM to be used for general purpose MCUs and automotive SOCs, he said. “The thermal stability has not been there for the magnetic layers. If you solve that data retention problem then it opens up much wider markets," he added.  MRAM had demonstrated non-volatility, high reliability and manufacturability in previous technology nodes, Eggleston said, but has been challenged to scale to 2x nm node geometries and BEOL compatibility process temperatures for embedded memories. As outlined in the paper, the magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) stack and integration was been optimized for a 400 degree Celsius, 60-minute post-MTJ patterning thermal budget and compatible with CMOS BEOL.  The three major foundries are all introducing it as a product and customers are picking up GlobalFoundries' PDK to started designing for it, said Eggleston. The major fab equipment makers started getting involved several years ago because they believed there was enough business, so the tools are available for deposition and etch of the MTJ. “They invested and developed products in conjunction with large fabs like us and with small companies such as Everspin," Eggleston said.  MCU customers, in the meantime, have started seriously looking at how MRAM can enhance their architectures, said Eggleston. “They get faster write speed and they get higher endurance," he said. This gives them the capability to use embedded MRAM where they might have previously used SRAM. Eggleston said the 2x nm node is the sweet spot in terms of circuitry simplicity and manufacturing costs.  The market opportunity for eMRAM is not dissimilar to those of other emerging memory technologies as well as incumbents: new high-volume markets include mobility, networking, data centers, Internet of Things (IoT) and automotive, said Eggleston. For Globalfoundries, the latter two are the most relevant. “We used to say they were largely the same, but as a foundry we got lots of traction in automotive," he said.  eFlash has been the incumbent embedded memory, but there are many emerging options that can potentially address these markets, said Eggleston. In addition to eMRAM, there is phase change memory (PCM), embedded Resistive RAM (eRRAM), carbon nanotube (CNT) and ferroelectric (FeFET). All have tradeoffs when it comes to retention, efficiency and speed, he said. Both CNT and FeFET show promise, but are too immature, while PCM is too specialized and fading away from embedded applications.  “MRAM and RRAM both have similar capabilities," said Eggleston. “They're both backend aligned memories so that gives you the ability to pretty easily implement them into a logic process." Processes include those that require bulk silicon, FD-SOI or FinFET. eFlash is built down into the silicon, he said, and would be more challenging to build into all of those variants.  RRAM is a simpler stack, said Eggleston, as there are fewer materials required between the electrodes. “It also doesn't require the same investment in equipment MRAM does," he said. "MRAM certainly requires unique capital equipment to do that complex stack." However, he said, RRAM hasn't shown the ability to provide the data retention, speed, and endurance balance required by the broader market.  What MRAM offers over RRAM is versatility, said Eggleston, because its material composition can be tuned between electrodes. “You can tune it either for great data retention or for really fast write speed and endurance," he said. This tuneability, he added, will enable Globalfoundries to address the space at advanced nodes previously addressed by eFlash, as well as tune it for speed for use as a non-volatile cache in server processors and storage controllers.
2017-06-30 00:00 阅读量:1002
MRAM Momentum Poised to Disrupt Memory Workhorses
  Last year could be described as a tipping point for the magneto-resistive random access memory (MRAM) market. Up until then, Everspin Technologies was the only company shipping commerical MRAM products. But as Spin Transfer Technologies (STT) CEO Barry Hoberman is always quick to acknowledge, Everspin's success has helped to pave the way for other MRAM players.  The genesis of STT goes back as far as 2001 with technology originally developed from research conducted by New York University Professor Andrew Kent. STT was formed and incubated by Boston-based Allied Minds in 2007. In September 2016, the developer of orthogonal spin transfer MRAM technology (OST-MRAM) announced it had fabricated perpendicular MRAM magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) as small as 20nm at its development fab based at the company's headquarters in Fremont, Calif.  Since then, STT has delivered samples of its spin transfer torque MRAM to customers in North America and Asia, a milestone that's significant in that it's one of several emerging memories considered to be a next-generation candidate to replace DRAM and NAND flash, which face scaling challenges as the industry moves to smaller nodes. STT is one of a handful of firms developing MRAM, so the delivery of samples is an important proof point validating both MRAM in general, and STT's technology in particular.  EE Times recently spoke with Hoberman about the company's ramp up, and the opportunities for MRAM as more players go to market, including where it might be a viable replacement for incumbent technologies.  EE Times Memory Designline: What has been the response to your sampling program so far?  Barry Hoberman: We've sampled to a good range of customers and enough of them are large, well-established, highly credible evaluators of this kind of memory. Our goal in this sampling cycle was to produce complete memories that met a robust measure of reliability. We're excited to have circulated devices that everybody is coming back with and saying they are fully functional, they've met all of the specs that were offered, and they couldn't find any errors. That's a great door opener for us pushing into the next engagement with customers who now rightly recognize us a company that has got baseline third-generation pMTJ technology that we know how to craft into working memories.  EE Times: How have the challenges for developing MRAM commercially differed from other emerging memories?  Barry Hoberman: The thing that is really important to grasp about MTJs is that they have had for over 10 years of proven production and reliability capabilities as used in the read heads of disk drives. Three and four billion read heads per year incorporate MTJs. The problem with MRAM is figuring out how to integrate the MTJ into the CMOS flow, how to craft the MTJ performance characteristics into something that is compatible with memory, and then how to scale up the fabrication of the MTJs – rather than one per read head, something in the order of a billion per memory chip. Those are three main challenges. It's very different from the other new memory technologies such as phase change, resistive RAM and nanowire, where the physics of the technology are all completely new, and not proven in any kind of manufacturing chain, nor have any working industrial ecosystem supporting them.  EE Times: You've referred to competitors such as Everspin as fellow pioneers on the MRAM trail. How do you view their successes as you move forward with your own technology?  Barry Hoberman: It's a confidence builder all the way across the ecosystem — investors, customers, equipment providers.  EE Times: What is your sense of potential MRAM going forward?  Barry Hoberman: We're aware of four foundries that have third-generation pMJT-based MRAM on their roadmap to enter production in the second half of 2018 timeframe or relatively soon after. MRAM positions as this early stage as three technologies. One, as a replacement for the NVM space, primarily embedded NOR flash. There's also a horizon for it to act as replacement for conventional CMOS high-speed embedded SRAM. We think our technology better differentiates in that space. The third space is in DRAM replacement. That market is probably going to start a little bit lower density, and the uptake in the market is likely to be led by persistence characteristics that help particularly in storage applications.  EE Times: To date, a lot of adoption of MRAM has been around storage applications. Are there examples of emerging applications in other market segments?  Barry Hoberman: There's a couple place in mobile phones where they need static memories upwards of 200Mbs and when you try do that with SRAM, it's a real cost distortion. Going to lower cost static memory looks very desirable. Moreover, because it's in mobile, they're sensitive to power. And the conventional solution below 40nm is a massive power hog in terms of leakage. Replacing that SRAM with MRAM almost completely wipes out that leakage. There's also the challenge of protecting data in flight. There are places where they want to have high bandwidth, high speed data moving through a system while it's on its way to its permanent storage location. The fault conditions that can jeopardize data before it makes it to its final resting place where it's completely secured and confirmed is an issue, and MRAM looks to be the ideal solution to that problem.  EE Times: How has the more pervasive use of flash created opportunities for MRAM?  Barry Hoberman: Think of partitioning the storage in a solid-state drive into a large amount of storage that has the time characteristics of flash – some people call it micro-second class NVM – and a lesser amount of storage that's build around a high-speed, persistent type of memory technology – some people call it nanosecond NVM. When you hybridize the system around those two technologies, properly partitioned for cost, you get a performance multiplier in the random IOPs relative to a conventional flash-based SSD by about an order of magnitude improvement.  EE Times: The Internet of Things (IoT) is creating new ways of using existing memory technologies to address issues such as power consumption while requiring relatively low densities. How can MRAM play a role?  Barry Hoberman: If you want to look at a straight out, face-to-face comparison with the other alternatives that are looking at IoT such as phase change and resistive RAM, and also flash, they simply don't have the endurance characteristics to do any of the things that look like data logging functions, especially where there's data logging functions running off of a small battery.  EE Times: Beyond the commitments of the foundries, what do you see driving development of MRAM in the next 12 to 18 months?  Barry Hoberman: The first major foundry that drops this into a production product line and truly starts to ship it is going to turn a tornado in the industry. The semi-conductor industry really has to keep in mind that the workhorses for the last forty-plus years have been variations of three technologies – SRAM, DRAM, and flash and its progenitor technologies. This is going to be the first major high-volume thing. There have been some either niche-ness technologies such as FRAM and EEPROM and they have all suffered from their niche-ness. But when you drop in MRAM, the characteristics are such that it's really the first thing to enter the framework in forty to fifty years. That alone is huge.
2017-06-14 00:00 阅读量:955
  • 一周热料
  • 紧缺物料秒杀
型号 品牌 询价
TL431ACLPR Texas Instruments
MC33074DR2G onsemi
CDZVT2R20B ROHM Semiconductor
RB751G-40T2R ROHM Semiconductor
BD71847AMWV-E2 ROHM Semiconductor
型号 品牌 抢购
STM32F429IGT6 STMicroelectronics
ESR03EZPJ151 ROHM Semiconductor
BU33JA2MNVX-CTL ROHM Semiconductor
TPS63050YFFR Texas Instruments
IPZ40N04S5L4R8ATMA1 Infineon Technologies
BP3621 ROHM Semiconductor
热门标签
ROHM
Aavid
Averlogic
开发板
SUSUMU
NXP
PCB
传感器
半导体
相关百科
关于我们
AMEYA360微信服务号 AMEYA360微信服务号
AMEYA360商城(www.ameya360.com)上线于2011年,现 有超过3500家优质供应商,收录600万种产品型号数据,100 多万种元器件库存可供选购,产品覆盖MCU+存储器+电源芯 片+IGBT+MOS管+运放+射频蓝牙+传感器+电阻电容电感+ 连接器等多个领域,平台主营业务涵盖电子元器件现货销售、 BOM配单及提供产品配套资料等,为广大客户提供一站式购 销服务。