Apple vs Qualcomm: How can one US company block another in China?

发布时间：2018-12-12 00:00
作者：Ameya360
来源：CNBC
阅读量：3098

Apple vs Qualcomm: How can one US company block another in China?

Mike Blake | Reuters

A pedestrian passes a sign on the Qualcomm campus in San Diego, California.

The ban of some Apple iPhones in China shows that intellectual property rights are still determined by national borders.

Qualcomm announced Monday that a court in China — the Fuzhou Intermediate People's Court — had granted the chipmaker's request for two preliminary injunctions against four of Apple's Chinese subsidiaries for patent infringement.

The two patents cover the ability to adjust and reformat photographs, and navigate through applications with a touchscreen. Apple has appealed the Chinese court order, which bans the sale of seven older iPhone models, ranging from 6s to X.

"A patent in the U.S. is not a patent in China, unless someone registers a patent in China," said Matthew Dresden, an attorney at Harris Bricken covering international intellectual property. "It's just another facet in another battle between two tech titans."

Qualcomm and Apple have been embroiled in a years-long legal dispute over patent royalties.

Both companies are based in California, but generate a significant portion of their revenues from China. For the fiscal year that ended in late September, Apple reported that 19.6 percent of net sales came from greater China.

Qualcomm said revenues from China, including Hong Kong, accounted for 67 percent of total consolidated revenues for fiscal year 2018, which also ended in late September. The chipmaker also said in the report it has not recorded any revenues for royalties due on sales of Apple products since the third quarter of 2017.

It is relatively cheaper and quicker for one party to bring a case against another in China compared to the U.S., said Eileen Li, head of research at Shanghai-based market intelligence firm Red Pulse. The environment for high-end industries is also more favorable in China given Beijing's efforts to produce more technology at home through Made in China 2025, she added.

"In general, China is known for having what industries would call copycats. (Most of these are in) consumer and retail areas," Li said. "With tech, China is tightening a lot of its policy and becoming more serious about IP protection."

It remains to be seen whether a preliminary injunction from a municipal court in China will have a lasting, nation-wide effect. The ban does not cover Apple's latest iPhone models and the company said all versions of the smartphone remain available for customers in China.

（备注：文章来源于网络，信息仅供参考，不代表本网站观点，如有侵权请联系删除！）

上一篇：US has a 'concerted strategy' to push allies to reject Huawei's 5G equipment: Eurasia Group

下一篇：Huawei CFO back in Canada court as bail hearing set to wrap

在线留言询价

相关阅读
Apple Reveals Qualcomm Patent Fees
Trade news

Apple Reveals Qualcomm Patent Fees

Qualcomm charges a 5% royalty, or about $12 to $20, per smartphone plus a large “CDMA tax,” Apple’s chief operating officer testified in an antitrust case here. The testimony put on the record some details of Qualcomm’s licensing practices that have long drawn industry complaints.Apple struck a deal with Qualcomm in 2007 to set royalties on iPhones at $7.50 per handset. In 2011, the two struck a deal to keep royalties at the same level while giving Qualcomm “short-term” exclusivity as the iPhone’s cellular baseband supplier.The “7.50 [royalty] may not sound like a lot, but it [amounted to] billions of dollars a year,” said Jeff Williams, who led the first iPhone team and is now Apple’s COO. “It is not FRAND, in our view, compared to everyone else … Qualcomm charged more than everyone else together.”“The alternative was that it defaults to the contract manufacturer’s rate of $17 to $18 [per phone, and] if we pursued them legally, we wouldn’t have access to chips … [and] risk getting our brand-new iPhone enjoined,” said Williams, adding, “Qualcomm represented [$7.50] as the average price paid.”Although patent licensing at the handset level has become widely used, Apple found it unfair.“We led the charge to add a lot of NAND memory” in handsets, but “if we put an extra $100 in NAND, they would get $5 of that even though they didn’t have anything to do with it,” he said. Apple spends “an extra $60 in stainless steel enclosures, and Qualcomm would collect an extra $3 — that didn’t make sense to us, and it still doesn’t today,” he added.The original $7.50 royalty “didn’t apply to CDMA phones or iPads,” said Williams, later calling licensing terms for the cellular protocol that Qualcomm developed “roughly a $250 million CDMA tax.”Apple initially proposed that it pay $1.50 per baseband chip used. Under the final deal, Apple’s contract manufacturers paid Qualcomm its usual 5% handset royalty under their existing patent licenses, Apple reimbursed them, and Qualcomm reimbursed Apple. Apple avoided striking a patent deal directly with Qualcomm under the arrangement.As part of the 2011 deal, Apple asked Qualcomm for a billion dollars to transition from using Infineon basebands.“They wanted exclusivity,” Williams said. “We proposed that we’d give them 100% sole-sourced for the short term, [but] in the long term, that wasn’t our plan.”However, “long-term [exclusivity] provisions wound up in the agreement … [and] made it prohibitively expensive to work with someone else,” he added. “For example, it cut off work with Intel” on a baseband for an iPad Mini in 2013 … overall, “our strategy is to dual-source.”Today, “Qualcomm continues to ship products on [Apple] design wins they have,” Williams said. “We have been unable to get them to support us on new design wins since [Apple sued Qualcomm in 2017]. This has been a challenge.”“Our strategy was to dual-source [basebands] in 2018,” he said. “We were working toward doing that with Qualcomm, but in the end, they would not support us and sell us chips.”As a result, “I went to [Intel CEO] Brian Krzanich and said that I was sorry, but instead of 50%, I need 100%” of iPhone basebands. “He had to scramble and go to his board to get almost a billion in capital to support us,” Williams said.Meanwhile, Qualcomm “is suing us in court all over the world on non-essential patents,” he said. “They are trying to get a hit in any one of those courts with an injunction to cause enough pain to make us pay tens of billions of dollars in their ransom … They said [that Apple is] an ideal target [because] unless [we] run the table, they will win.”In testimony Friday, Qualcomm’s CEO gave his own views on the deal and its efforts to continue working with Apple.Under cross-examination, a Qualcomm attorney noted that Apple gave the chip vendor a “moonshot challenge” to deliver a single chip baseband for LTE. The chip made it into the iPhone 5. In its launch, Apple founder Steve Jobs called the chip “one of the real breakthroughs” of the handset.
2019-01-15 00:00 阅读量：3126
Apple Testifies in Q’com Patent Case
Trade news

Apple Testifies in Q’com Patent Case

Qualcomm and Apple faced off in San Jose District Court Friday in the ongoing dispute over patents. An Apple executive suggested Qualcomm’s royalties were more than $10 per iPhone.Qualcomm refused to supply chips without a patent license and paid Apple “huge” royalty rebates to use its cellular baseband chips exclusively, according to testimony today by Apple’s head of procurement in San Jose district court. Attorneys for Qualcomm noted Apple used Infineon and Intel modems exclusively at different periods and evaluated several alternative suppliers.The case, brought by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, alleges Qualcomm has used unfair licensing policies to dominate the cellular chip market for years. Witnesses include a laundry list of carriers and chip and handset makers. The trial before Judge Lucy Koh is scheduled to conclude early next month.Tony Blevins, Apple’s vice president of procurement, recalled a "watershed meeting” in late 2013 with now Qualcomm president Cristiano Amon. At the time Apple was trying to reduce the cost of Qualcomm baseband chips it was using by conducting an analysis of manufacturing costs at TSMC where both companies both made chips.Amon “finally leveled with me. He said, ‘I just came back from an investors conference and I am under intense pressure to monitize [our technology] and I will have whatever the market can bear and Apple can afford to pay this — we don’t need to talk about costs and margins.’”Blevins said he canceled the rest of his meetings for the day. “We needed to do something different or we would be in a bad place, [so] we kicked off a new project to find an alternative supplier” called Project Antique, Blevins said.The effort ultimately led to exclusive use today of cellular modems from Intel’s wireless group, which has its heritage in the Infineon group that was the sole supplier for the first two generations of iPhones, a Qualcomm attorney noted.“We made this challenge, so Qualcomm was no longer willing to sell us chips…we want both Qualcomm and Intel in the mix — competition leads to…more diligent technical schedules and innovation,” Blevins said.Qualcomm’s alleged use of a unique practice of linking patent licensing deals to chip sales is at the heart of the case. Blevins said it first came to his attention in a 2005 letter from Qualcomm in response to Apple’s request for baseband samples and specs as part of an evaluation for the original iPhone.“In substitute of samples, we got this letter” asking for a patent license first. “In 20 years in this industry I had never seen a letter like this…Our interpretation was ‘no license, no chips,’” Blevins said.Qualcomm also asked for a cross-license to Apple’s IP.  “We were taken aback. We knew we would not cross license our IP back to them, we were [just] going to buy a chip,” he said.About two years ago, NXP asked Apple to sign a patent license in exchange for access to its NFC chips. “I was on vacation...and called [the NXP] CEO that day and said if they want more money put it in the hardware [price] and [we’ll see if] it's competitive. They withdrew their request for a license that day,” he said.Apple and Qualcomm struck five patent and supply agreements from 2007 to 2013. The latest ones included deals to get large rebates of royalties pad in exchange for exclusive use of Qualcomm modems.Qualcomm executives Derek Aberle and Amon both suggested Apple could get a “royalty less than $10 [per handset] only if we brought additional value to the table — if you bring me exclusivity,” Blevins said.Apple considered the reduced royalties to be still higher than those paid by its rivals, but they didn’t “gouge us…They made it very unattractive to choose another supplier…it was no longer a level playing field as it was before,” he added.Due to the exclusivity deal, Blevins cancelled plans in the works to use an Intel data-only cellular modem in an iPad Mini 2. Apple had internally agreed the design win would be a step to working Intel modems into iPhones.In a call to Hermann Eul, then Intel's general manager, “I expressed misgivings. They hadn’t don’t anything [wrong, but] we had an agreement with Qualcomm,” he said.In another meeting, the head of Qualcomm’s licensing group, Eric Reifschneider, asserted his dominance over Amon, who led the chip group, Blevins reported.“Cristiano was speaking directly to me, and Eric cut him off and said, ‘I run a division that makes two-thirds of corporate profits and you make one third, so let’s be clear who does the talking,’ I felt it was inappropriate in front of a customer to make such a statement and unfair to Cristiano,” Blevins said.Qualcomm would not agree to terms of supply agreements Apple considered standard with other suppliers, driving harder deals around patents, Belvins said. “It was uncommon for me to deal with any company’s licensing team, but with Qualcomm it became common,” he added.A Qualcomm attorney noted that in 2007-2009 agreements, Apple agreed to pay Qualcomm royalties although it did not buy its chips then. Apple continues to consider Mediatek and Samsung as alternative baseband suppliers and in the past had considered ST Ericsson and Texas Instruments as well, she noted.The FTC continued its case Friday with testimony from licensing and procurement executives from Samsung and Lenovo’s Motorola group.
2019-01-14 00:00 阅读量：1140
Apple's China struggles highlight US companies' trade war vulnerabilities
Trade news

Apple's China struggles highlight US companies' trade war vulnerabilities

Apple — one of the world's most valuable public companies by market capitalization and a bellwether for the technology sector — slashed its revenue guidance on Wednesday, highlighting just how vulnerable large American companies are to the ongoing U.S.-Chinatrade war.Apple CEO Tim Cook told CNBC's Josh Lipton that the trade dispute between the world's two largest economies is exacerbating economic issues in China, which is an important source of revenue for the company.Other companies could face similar problems, according to experts."Weakening iPhone sales in China highlight the vulnerability of many U.S. multinationals to the U.S.-China trade war, both due the exposure of their manufacturing supply chains to China and because of the growing importance of China as a key consumer market for many U.S. products," said Rajiv Biswas, Asia Pacific chief economist at IHS Markit.Although data showed China's economy holding up for much of 2018, it now appears to be slowing as production metrics and export orders fall amid the country's dispute with the U.S., its largest trading partner.The fallout from a Chinese economic slowdown is likely to extend to other sectors like consumer spending — potentially hitting American companies that are doing business in Asia's largest economy."The U.S. is not the ultimate and unequivocal consumer with powers to dictate U.S.-China trade terms; given ... the undeniably large Chinese market with an aspirational and savvy middle class," said Vishnu Varathan, head of economics and strategy at Mizuho Bank."As such, U.S.-China trade disputes will be bumpy given the gap between U.S. President Donald Trump's perceived sense of leverage and a much more modest reality," Varathan told CNBC.Washington and Beijing agreed in early December to pause tariff escalations, but headlines about the ongoing negotiations have continued to send jitters through the market. Prior to that agreement, China and the U.S. had gone back and forth threatening to implement levies on billions of dollars worth of imports.While high profile, Apple's status in China is unlikely to be a bargaining chip in the trade negotiations, said Dan Wang, analyst at the Economist Intelligence Unit. "It's not a core technolo(gy) that both countries want," she said.However, if the trade dispute escalates, Apple products such as the iPhone may be subjected to higher tariffs imposed by both sides.The "iPhone's vulnerability to the US-China trade war serves as a red flag warning of the importance of concluding a U.S.-China trade deal in early 2019 to end the bilateral trade dispute and remove market fears about further escalation of the trade war," said IHS' Biswas.After all, in the case of smartphones, the Chinese burgeoning consumer class has a plethora of iPhone alternatives to choose from — especially if a trade war with the U.S. sparks anti-American sentiments that extend to products."An antagonistic U.S. may only tip the balance in favor of Chinese consumers adopting home-made devices rather than products like Apple," said Varathan.Louis Kuijs, head of Asia Economics at Oxford Economics, echoed that sentiment, telling CNBC that "this whole trade conflict between the U.S. and China is also affecting a little bit the choices that Chinese people make when they buy phones at the moment."
2019-01-07 00:00 阅读量：1157
Apple's iPhone sales warning is crushing European chip stocks, AMS dives 19%
Trade news

Apple's iPhone sales warning is crushing European chip stocks, AMS dives 19%

European chip stocks tumbled on Thursday after Apple cut its first-quarter revenue guidance citing weaker-than-expected iPhone sales and slowing economic growth in China.Austrian chipmaker AMS nosedived 19 percent while Swiss firm STMicroelectronics dropped around 7 percent. Both companies are semiconductor suppliers for Apple devices.Shares of Anglo-German chip supplier Dialog Semiconductors plunged 7 percent at the open in Frankfurt. In October, Apple agreed to buy a portion of Dialog's business in a $600 million deal.Other chip stocks including Dutch firm ASM International and Germany-based Siltronic also fell at the open amid pressure in the semiconductor industry. The broader European Stoxx 600 tech index was the worst performing sector in Europe on Thursday, trading down around 2 percent.The moves in Europe followed losses in Asia's tech sector among Apple suppliers.Apple CEO Tim Cook issued a letter to investors Wednesday lowering the iPhone maker's fiscal first quarter revenue guidance to $84 billion, down from a previous range of $89 billion to $93 billion.In an interview with CNBC's Josh Lipton on Wednesday, Cook said trade tensions between the U.S. and China were one factor weighing on the tech giant's outlook.Apple shares traded down roughly 7 percent in extended hours on Thursday. Several Apple suppliers have cut their outlook in recent months citing weak demand.
2019-01-04 00:00 阅读量：1165
热门分类
盒子，外壳，机架 电缆，电线 电路保护 连接器，互连器件 开发套件 机电产品 嵌入式解决方案 风扇，热管理 光电元件 其它 无源元件 电源 半导体 传感器，变送器 测试与测量
  • 一周热料
  • 紧缺物料秒杀
型号 品牌 询价
TL431ACLPR Texas Instruments
CDZVT2R20B ROHM Semiconductor
MC33074DR2G onsemi
RB751G-40T2R ROHM Semiconductor
BD71847AMWV-E2 ROHM Semiconductor
型号 品牌 抢购
TPS63050YFFR Texas Instruments
BP3621 ROHM Semiconductor
STM32F429IGT6 STMicroelectronics
ESR03EZPJ151 ROHM Semiconductor
BU33JA2MNVX-CTL ROHM Semiconductor
IPZ40N04S5L4R8ATMA1 Infineon Technologies
热门标签
ROHM
Aavid
Averlogic
开发板
SUSUMU
NXP
PCB
传感器
半导体
原厂授权品牌
更多授权品牌>>
资讯排行榜
  • 周排行榜
  • 月排行榜

相关百科
关于我们
AMEYA360微信服务号 AMEYA360微信服务号
AMEYA360商城(www.ameya360.com)上线于2011年，现 有超过3500家优质供应商，收录600万种产品型号数据，100 多万种元器件库存可供选购，产品覆盖MCU+存储器+电源芯 片+IGBT+MOS管+运放+射频蓝牙+传感器+电阻电容电感+ 连接器等多个领域,平台主营业务涵盖电子元器件现货销售、 BOM配单及提供产品配套资料等，为广大客户提供一站式购 销服务。