Ameya360:How EVs are Driving Us to an Eco-Friendly Future

发布时间:2023-01-29 11:17
作者:Ameya360
来源:网络
阅读量:1993

  One of the largest sustainability initiatives in the world is the push toward widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs). While there are still those who question the sustainability of EVs, they undoubtedly mark a positive change in the world.

Ameya360:How EVs are Driving Us to an Eco-Friendly Future

  EV adoption is currently increasing in the United States for several reasons—EV’s not only utilize energy more efficiently, but they produce a much lower carbon footprint compared to traditional internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV). According to Experian, battery EVs doubled their market share in the U.S. during the first six months of 2022.

  A more efficient use of energy

  Though most of the electricity for EVs may come from fossil fuels, many people overlook the fact that EVs still represent a more efficient use of this energy than the alternative.

  A standard power plant on the grid is significantly more efficient than a gasoline engine in a car. Natural-gas-fueled power plants can reach efficiencies as high as 60%, while the efficiency of an internal combustion engine in a vehicle can be as low as 20%, according to the National Academy of Sciences and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Therefore, EVs make much more efficient use of fossil fuels by displacing the energy conversion from inside a gasoline engine to a more efficient power plant.

  The U.S. electrical grid receives about 40% of its energy from renewable sources, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Forty percent of the electricity used by EVs is clean, compared to 0% of the energy from gasoline—a number which will never get any higher.

  All things considered, by switching from an ICEV to an EV, a driver can expect to reduce their carbon footprint from driving by 60% to 70%—even without being powered by clean, renewable electricity. Obviously, a customer whose electric car is completely powered by clean electricity would reduce their carbon footprint from driving by 100%.

  Image of eco-friendly EVs and other green energy alternatives

  Reducing and displacing air pollutants

  Beyond the efficiency benefits of eco-friendly EVs compared to ICEVs, EVs offer additional advantages in terms of improved air quality and public health.

  The six “criteria”, or common, air pollutants that can negatively impact human health are particulate matter, ground-level ozone, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and lead, according to the EPA. All these pollutants are produced by burning of fossil fuels, both in internal combustion engines and at power plants. EVs can make an impact here by changing where these fossil fuels are burned.

  With ICEVs, these criteria air pollutants are generated and emitted into the air in high concentrations and, more importantly, in locations and at times that are more likely to harm people. Consider the fact that the highest concentration of pollution-emitting vehicles will correlate directly to areas with the highest concentration of people—be it a crowded city street or residential area. Here, ICEVs are directly affecting public health, releasing the criteria air pollutants exactly where and when we don’t want them.

  By using EVs, which don’t emit air pollutants, we benefit by transferring these emissions away from the vehicle and to the power plant. The important point here is that power plants generally do not operate in highly concentrated residential areas, but instead normally operate in more remote locations and utilize emission-control technology. Unlike gasoline engines, power plants have the potential to be zero emission.

  In this way, the adoption of EVs significantly keeps toxic pollutants away from large concentrations of people, ensuring greater public safety and health.

  The fossil fuel supply chain

  Some may argue that the supply chains involved to produce EVs, and particularly their batteries, are not sustainable. It’s important to acknowledge, however, the impact of the existing supply chains for ICEVs and their fuel.

  These existing supply chains come with several environmental hazards: To produce the gasoline that we use to fuel our cars, we must explore for the crude oil, produce it, physically transport it, refine it, and then distribute it as gasoline. Throughout this entire process, we are consuming an enormous amount of energy just to get the fuel to our cars where they create even more waste.

  If we stopped turning crude oil into refined gasoline, we would be able to cut out unnecessary energy expenditure. Instead, we could utilize that energy to power our EVs, homes, and infrastructure. Even further, eradicating the gasoline supply chain would have the additional environmental benefit of eliminating unnecessary environmental hazards associated with gasoline production, such as oil spills.

  An evolving process for eco-friendly EVs

  When it comes to evaluating the environmental impact of EVs, we must keep in mind that we cannot expect the transition to EVs to be perfect. They are, like any other innovation, constantly evolving and will become ever more sustainable.

  At the end of the day, EVs represent a massive improvement to our environment through efficient energy use, reduction of air pollutants, and a more sustainable supply chain. By combining these improvements with increased awareness, education, policy change, and resources, our society can continue to reduce our carbon footprint and protect our planet.


(备注:文章来源于网络,信息仅供参考,不代表本网站观点,如有侵权请联系删除!)

在线留言询价

相关阅读
Lithium Batteries for EVs: NMC or LFP?
  Among the many commercial battery technologies, lithium-based batteries excel in the two primary energy-storage figures of merit, namely energy density by volume and weight. Of course, the term “lithium battery” really encompasses various chemistry and construction arrangements. Like all batteries, lithium-ion batteries have two electrodes: an anode and a cathode.  NMC VS. LFP  In electric vehicles (EVs), the dominant cathode chemistries are lithium nickel manganese cobalt (LiNixMnyCozO2, designated NMC) and lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4 or LFP). Which is the better battery for EVs? As a general statement, NMC batteries offer higher energy capacity than LFP and so might seem to be preferred for EVs where range is a critical parameter, but they are also more expensive.  Cost comparison  How much more? That’s a difficult question to answer since the cost is highly dependent on the fluctuating prices of the underlying commodities which constitute the battery. (Note that “commodity” in this context does not mean “widely, easily available, with little price differentiation” such as light bulbs or even PCs; instead, it refers to a base material which rarely used in its raw form but which is used as a building block or key ingredient.) The iron-based battery cells cost less than the nickel-and-cobalt combination used widely in North America and Europe.  Along with energy density figures, another critical figure of merit for batteries is the cost per stored kilowatt-hour ($/kWh). Although the numbers fluctuate with the changes in commodity pricing, rough estimates are that LFP cells are in the ~$70/kWh range, a significant 30% less than NMC cells at ~$100/kWh.  As part of the effort to build a more affordable electric car, automakers are turning to that lower-cost battery type, but it also delivers less driving range, a major concern in some regions and a much smaller one in others. Several car companies plan to increasingly deploy LFP batteries in the U.S., and they are commonly used in China, the world’s largest market for electric cars.  Market forecast for EV batteries  LFP batteries already comprise 17% of the global EV market and represent a potential path for the mass market, according to the AlixPartners 2022 Global Automotive Outlook (Reference 1). Tesla announced in October 2021 that it was switching to LFP batteries for its standard-range models (Model 3 and Model Y), while retaining the NMC cells for longer-range models. Rivian Automotive, Inc., an emerging maker of smaller electric trucks that is getting lots of Wall Street and other attention will be using LFP batteries in their vehicles.  The forecast for the various battery types is hazy, typical of all such predictions. The conventional thinking was that the “better” NMC batteries would dominate the EV market, but that wisdom may be somewhat incorrect. A report from ARK Investment Management LLC indicates that continued cost declines, nickel supply constraints, and improving EV efficiency should propel the market share of LFP cells from roughly 33% in 2021 to ~47% by 2026, Figure and Reference 2. (Of course, there are countless such forecasts out there and you can undoubtedly find one which provides the answer you are seeking if you have an agenda!)  Among the many available forecasts, ARK Investment Management LLC projects that the market share of lower-cost LFP batteries will grow from roughly 33% in 2021 to about 47% by 2026.  Of course, all these forecasts have to be taken with a huge grain of salt, as the cliché goes. For example, the equity analyst who leads global EV battery research at UBS Group AG, now expects EVs equipped with LFP batteries to account for 40% of the global market by 2030, up from a previous forecast of 15% (Reference 3). (Incidentally, this is an excellent example of forecasters saying, “oh well, never mind what we said then”!)  If energy density and cost were the only issues, the decision of which battery chemistry to use in EVs or even non-vehicular situations would be tricky but have only a few variables. Reality is quite different, however, as there are many geopolitical, supply chain, and other technical factors that complicate the assessment:  • The supply chain for LFP cells is heavily concentrated in China, leaving automakers more dependent on Chinese battery supplies at a time when the industry is trying to wean itself from dependence on China for EV technology.  • Automakers are trying to limit the use of cobalt in response to environmental and human rights violations in cobalt mining in Congo, where the majority of the metal is produced.  • Russia is a large supplier of high-grade nickel used in batteries.  • LFP is well-suited to situations where the vehicle is frequently recharged and there is room for a physically larger pack; delivery vehicles are a good fit.  • LFPs have lower manufacturing costs and are easier to produce.  • LFPs can be charged to 100% without degrading battery life; in contrast, NMC cells should be limited to 80% to maximize life. This means that the actual effective range of an EV using LFP cells is close to one with NMC cells, but there’s greater weight penalty of the LFP negates that factor to a large extent. However, for applications such as tools or fixed-in-place machinery where weight is not as critical, LFPs can provide longer run time after a full charge.  • LFPs can operate effectively over a wide temperature range, especially on the low end. On the other side, they are slower to charge at lower temperatures.  • LFPs deliver nearly five times as many charge cycles as NMCs and suffer less degradation at higher temperatures and at faster charge/discharge rates, so they are better suited to handle high-performance driving and quick charging.  No doubt of it: There are a lot of cross-currents here and the entire NMC-versus-LFP situation is fluid and dynamic, with dependencies on many non-engineering factors as well as purely technical ones. Further, battery pricing is driven by short-term commodity pricing bumping into long-term contracts between supplies and customers.  Summary and conclusion  How you assess and quantify the battery technology and market situation depends to a large extent on where you are coming from. The forecasts and numbers are all over the place, partially due to the fact that different market analyses use a variety of criteria and metrics for various reasons.  Here’s what I wonder: given the uncertainties and importance of the battery pack to EV performance, perhaps in the near future manufacturers will list a suggested retail price for the EV itself without any battery at all, and then offer customers a choice between two or three battery-chemistries for a given vehicle – with the battery pack price being updated weekly or monthly. There is some historical precedent: back in the day, you could get some consumer products with lower-end carbon-zinc primary (non-rechargeable) battery packs or pay a modest premium for the better alkaline-battery packs.  When it comes to batteries, there is only one thing we all know for sure (except for some politicians, apparently, who believe they can legislate battery progress): battery technology is not guided by anything like Moore’s law which has defined semiconductor technology for 50+ years.  What’s your view on the mid- or long-term viability of LFP versus NMC-based batteries for EVs and even non-EV applications? Will the markets become highly fragmented, or will one type come to dominate?
2023-01-18 11:32 阅读量:1858
EVs Strain Clean-energy Supply, But Could Help Balance Grid
  Except for reducing noise and air pollution in cities, there is no reason to purchase an electric vehicle if it is going to be powered with electricity obtained from fossil fuels.  Consider a country such as Poland, where 33 percent of all passenger cars are 20 years or older and only 12 percent of the electricity generated comes from renewable sources. If Poland suddenly changed half of those cars to EVs, it could cause a much bigger environmental problem that the one it’s trying to solve, John Roome Sr., director for climate change issues at World Bank Group, noted last month during the World Bank’s first Innovate4Climate summit, held in Barcelona, Spain.  Even in countries such as Germany, with the highest solar power capacity in the European Union—40,782 megawatts by the end of November 2016—a sudden mass adoption of EVs could delay the planned phaseout of carbon-fired and nuclear power plants, as power demands would likely increase.  Other countries are already prepared. Norway, which has the highest penetration of EVs in the world, began transitioning to renewable energy—especially by wind turbines—more than 20 years ago. Rich in oil reserves, the country has invested heavily in wind, solar, and hydraulic power generation while selling its oil abroad. Now, as many EV owners begin to replace their car batteries with new ones, Norway is building renewable-energy storage stations with the old batteries, which still retain more than 80 percent of their original capacity.  Germany is looking to Norway as the ideal partner to source cheap, clean energy because of Norway’s huge capacity for hydropower generation. In fact, Norway could be the perfect source of electricity for Northern Europe, exporting hydropower when energy is in short supply in Germany and other countries, and later importing back surplus power that can be used to pump water back up to its reservoirs.  Bloomberg’s recently published “New Energy Outlook 2017” report projects that EVs will account for 12.5 percent of electricity generation in Europe and the United States by 2040. Other key forecasts are:  Seventy-two percent of the $10 trillion to be invested in new power generation worldwide by 2040 will go to renewables, with $2.8 trillion and $3.3 trillion invested in solar and wind power, respectively. The total investment in wind is higher because photovoltaic-panel prices are expected to continue to fall much faster than wind turbine prices.  By 2040, a dollar—not adjusted for inflation—will buy two to three times more solar electricity than it does today. And by 2030, the growth of EVs will push the cost of lithium-ion batteries down 73 percent.  The biggest problem for utility companies is that the energy produced by solar and wind power cannot be turned on and off when needed. So flexible capacity, from either hydropower or gas-fired power plants, will still be necessary in 2040. In Europe alone, “the changing grid creates opportunities for 103 GW of new flexible capacity, including 56 GW of batteries.”  Lithium-ion batteries for energy storage will become a $20 billion annual market by 2040, a tenfold increase from today.  Ultimately, however, the mass adoption of electric vehicles could be the solution for the grid. Storing electricity produced during the night, especially by wind turbines, is difficult and expensive, but using that electricity to charge EVs would be almost free, and their batteries could also be used as temporary or permanent storage. Electric cars, when not in use and connected to a power outlet, could give some of their battery power back to the grid when power demand increases.  Endesa, one of Spain’s big power companies and part of Italy’s Enel group, recently demonstrated this solution, called V2G (vehicle to grid), in Malaga during one stop of its “Tour of Spain in Electric Cars.” The Mitsubishi electric car used in the demo provided power to one of the relay stations in a popular neighborhood in the city.  The good news is that demand for EVs is increasing despite the lack of options in the markets, according to experts. As big auto manufacturers such as Ford, GM, and VW feel the pressure from newcomers such as Tesla, which targets the high-end market, new models will become available in different configurations to attract demanding customers.  With more EVs, the possibility of using them to balance renewable-energy generation increases. Power companies, automakers, and governments should coordinate long-term plans to deploy renewable energy infrastructure for the EVs that will be entering the market and use the opportunity to factor in EVs, and their used batteries, as temporary storage in the power grid.
2017-06-29 00:00 阅读量:1341
  • 一周热料
  • 紧缺物料秒杀
型号 品牌 询价
TL431ACLPR Texas Instruments
CDZVT2R20B ROHM Semiconductor
RB751G-40T2R ROHM Semiconductor
BD71847AMWV-E2 ROHM Semiconductor
MC33074DR2G onsemi
型号 品牌 抢购
BP3621 ROHM Semiconductor
ESR03EZPJ151 ROHM Semiconductor
BU33JA2MNVX-CTL ROHM Semiconductor
TPS63050YFFR Texas Instruments
IPZ40N04S5L4R8ATMA1 Infineon Technologies
STM32F429IGT6 STMicroelectronics
热门标签
ROHM
Aavid
Averlogic
开发板
SUSUMU
NXP
PCB
传感器
半导体
相关百科
关于我们
AMEYA360微信服务号 AMEYA360微信服务号
AMEYA360商城(www.ameya360.com)上线于2011年,现 有超过3500家优质供应商,收录600万种产品型号数据,100 多万种元器件库存可供选购,产品覆盖MCU+存储器+电源芯 片+IGBT+MOS管+运放+射频蓝牙+传感器+电阻电容电感+ 连接器等多个领域,平台主营业务涵盖电子元器件现货销售、 BOM配单及提供产品配套资料等,为广大客户提供一站式购 销服务。